![]() I do have silverfast, and Iĭo use it a bit, but I just feel I get better more accurate resultsįrom vuescan. I mostly get better results with Vuescan. Obviously, the "real time" view of any manipulations in Silverfast Silverfast has many features, but I would still welcome any comments. I realize this may not be a fair comparison given Overall comparison of the two programs from a quality of output Noise in the scan, it appears to work well enough.ģ. Serioulsy I use it for mainly 3/4 scans, to wipe out any chance of If you are scanning at 7200 dpi, 10 times plus How well does Vuescan multi-scan function work? Worth the extra When you refer to slides, are you referring to both Kodachrome and E-6 slides?Ģ. With a bit of tweaking, even my oldie slides are nice Works very well on slides, you can run it on its own, or in PS. Slides, they dont work well with infared removal, or ICE on other It replaces scratches with more skill, IMHO. It works pretty well, though I stick to low to Infrared function, it shouldn't be used on silver-based Kodachrome,įrom what I understand. Loss? Does it work on Kodachrome slides? If it is indeed an How well does Vuescan dust and scratch function work? Any detail I also upgraded to get the multi-exposure feature.ġ. ![]() I have a Plustek 7200i film scanner, so I am just learning to use Just curious as to some users experience with Vuescan and Silverfast. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |